Key Similarities and Differences of International Schools Compared with Those in the US or Canada
When asked the question about the similarities of international schools with those in the US or Canada, the overriding response is students’ needs. As one may understand, students have very similar needs no matter where in the world they may be or what social economic status they may enjoy. These needs may include but are not limited to: positive recognition, self-esteem, belonging, consistency, response to high expectations and achievement. Additionally, the notion of best practices cuts across all geographic boundaries and may include: inquiry-based learning, Professional Learning Communities (PLCs), inclusionary practices, engaged learning time, Understanding by Design (UbD), Response to Intervention (RTI), student-led conferences, the list goes on.
We also notice that, with the exception of some Southern Hemisphere schools, school calendars are relatively similar—although host countries will celebrate their legal and religious holidays and will expect international schools to comply with those important dates with school holidays. And, we see an array of governing structures that include, parent elected boards—similar to those US and Canadian public schools—as well as appointed and self-perpetuating boards which may mirror many US and Canadian independent schools.
Lastly and similar to many US and Canadian schools, international school campuses serve as community centers and the base of most community activities for families. In many overseas communities the school is the sole meeting place for the ex-patriot community—with adult team sports, community theater, concerts, social events, etc.
In contrast to US and Canadian public schools, overseas international schools seem better able to freely advance changes to their curriculum without intrusion from their home governments. This is contingent however on the school charter. There are numerous examples of programmatic initiatives that have been enthusiastically put in place, some of which include: the Global Issues Network (GIN), the International Primary Curriculum (IPC), Week Without Walls (WWW), the Visual Learning Project and many other relevant initiatives.
With the financial strength of many overseas schools, these and other initiatives may be developed and advanced readily with the requisite professional development needed for successful implementation.
There is an increasingly larger number of corporate or proprietary, for-profit schools established in non-Western locations. The growth of international or US schools in Asia and the Middle East is swelling geometrically if not exponentially. A number of newly established international schools and those with a US Advanced Placement curriculum are intended to educate children of host nationals with the expectation for those host national students will matriculate to US universities.
On a personal level, I have found that the biggest change for my family was becoming more globally-minded, more sensitive to differences in people and curious about other customs and norms of students who attend international schools. Lastly and once again on a personal level, we quickly discovered a change in our spending priorities with numerous travel opportunities afforded by virtue of living in a location outside our home country—and that has opened the door to the world and a perspective we never imagined could be realized.
Best of luck in your journey,
Paul DeMinico